Wednesday 8 January 2014

NYMPH()MANIAC - Vol I

It is becoming clear to me that pornography and cinema are becoming irreversibly closer. Nymphomaniac has been described as the film that no one should want to see, I found this a little unnerving, as I was very excited for this film. Lars Von Trier is a Danish filmmaker known for his controversial style of his filmmaking, and for thematically grouping his films into trilogies, based on their visuals and concepts. Nymphomaniac is the gripping two part finale to his depression trilogy. Like the other films in the trilogy, Charlotte Gainsbourg stars, this time as Joe, a self-diagnosed nymphomaniac, who, after she is discovered beaten in an alley, recounts her erotic history from the age of fifteen to the age of fifty.
So far, only the first part has been released, and overall the full length feature clocks in at five and a half hours. The cut down version, marketed as the soft-core version, was edited with Von Triers consent, but without his participation, and even for a cinemaphile like myself, spending 5 and a half hours watching any film, would be a little much. Fortunately the film features a surprisingly natural cutoff point, for the first part, Joe is played in flashbacks by Stacy Martin, a model, who is a surprisingly talented actress, who manages to hold the screen and the audience’s attention with a surprising amount of grace and elegance, and who manages to let us know how she I feeling with only the smallest of gestures. Charlotte Gainsbourg also delivers, her performance as Joe is understated and deep, and seeing as she is mostly narrating the film, she manages to induce so much pain and emotion, using only her voice. Shia LaBoeuf also stars in this film as Jerome, one of Joe’s many lovers. LaBoeuf manages to successfully play Jerome first as a fifteen year old boy, and secondly as a young man, not an easy feat. Uma Thurman also stars as Mrs H, in a slightly bizarre performance that nonetheless delivers, it is marvelous to see Thurman in a feature film again, having been absent from our screens for too long. Overall Nymphomaniac shows that Lars Von Trier really is excellent at directing actors, and the performances in this film are strong.
Overall the “present” of the film, takes place in an apartment, with Joe recounting her story to Seligman, played by Stellan Skarsgaard. The chemistry between these two actors is palpable, and they manage to play polar opposites, in terms of temperament and feeling, yet have so much connection. The film is split into chapters, with the names of the chapters being shown on the screen as in a novel. These chapters often feature a different tone or visual style than the others, for instance chapter 4 : Delerium, is entirely in black and white, and Chapter 3: Mrs H features a different aspect ratio to the other chapters and the first chapter, titled The Compleat Angler, features numerous analogies to fishing and flashback to fishing manuals and examples of fishing techniques. Overall I feel that by changing the visual style of each chapter, Von Trier is able to keep the film fresh, and stops it from dragging. By segmenting the film into chapters, Von Trier creates what is essentially a series of interconnected short stories, tied together by a narrative between Joe and Seligman.
One of the only real problems I have with this film, is that I don’t really understand what Lars Von Trier is trying to say about hypersexuality or about female sexuality, normally not entirely understanding a film isn’t a problem for me, a film can be enjoyable without being entirely understood, 2001: A Space Odyssey is a good example of this, however the problem with Nymphomaniac is that I’m not sure Lars Von Trier knows what he wants to say either, but ive decided that this is not really a problem, for years filmmakers have made action films that say absolutely nothing, but that are simply good fun. Nymphomaniac though perhaps not saying anything explicit of focused about our society or the omniscient presence of sexuality in the world, instead he is simply exploring this world with little focus or direction, and the results are startling. Von Trier creates a film which is an instinctive exploration of female sexuality, and from which the audience is encouraged to supplement with their own ideas and conclusions, I like this style of filmmaking, it feels somewhat interactive.
The tagline for the film is: “Forget About Love”, and the film certainly supports this in tone and in dialogue, much of Gainsbourg’s monologue is realistic and graphic in language, and Von Trier doesn’t shy away from the graphic nature of the work, however the film in its essence is romanticized, Joe recounts only the most important moments of her life, and many of these moments are subtly romanticized, Joe is reminded of three lovers she once had by a piece of organ music featuring three voices by Bach, Joe imagines the visiting the hospital in black and white during Chapter 4, and she imagines her childhood as an appealing and idyllic vision, in contrast with the strong, harsh words of her monologue. The fact that this film is a firsthand account itself tells us that this film is romanticized, Seligman remarks that Joe often sees herself in a negative light, and we will never really know how much of the story is true, and how much is imagined, thus it is reasonable to assume that the film is, in itself a romanticized version of true events, as a first person always account is.
The term enjoyed might be a little strong here, as Lars Von Trier might not be the first person to spring to mind when one thinks of pleasure, however overall I found Nymphomaniac to be a thrilling watch, gripping and suspenseful, that raises various questions about female sexuality and our relationship with eroticism, many of the questions Von Trier asks are projected onto the audience, requiring us to ask the same questions. Overall a talented cast with a breakout performance by Stacy Martin and visceral graphic direction make Nymphomaniac a powerful and deeply insightful watch. Rating: A-

Joe: Perhaps the only difference between me and other people is that I've always demanded more from the sunset. More spectacular colors when the sun hit the horizon. That's perhaps my only sin.



No comments:

Post a Comment